Re: [By Request] Video Recording
Posted: 30 Jan 2011, 07:39
I don't know why neoKen but, when I look at your videos they seem so stretched to me. It's like somebody stretched the sides by an inch.
Unofficial VO Community
https://www.oratan.com/forum/
480i 4:3 widescreen converted to deinterlaced 16:9 widescreen. Before uploading to youtube, my videos are 512x288 resolution, 60fps.neo helbeast wrote:I don't know why neoKen but, when I look at your videos they seem so stretched to me. It's like somebody stretched the sides by an inch.
Yes, the music were from chunkypuf's rip of CyberNet Rhapsody Episode #14 CD.S-Advent wrote:Those vids were awesome, and that special something has to do with the music, right?
Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.
So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!S-Advent wrote:Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.
Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).Schooly D wrote:So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!S-Advent wrote:Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.
Nice match, thanks for capturing and posting it.neoKEN wrote:Zaarock vs PhantomPhotonX. Aggressive play style.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOBXQLUkaRY
What Schooly is saying is that actually killing your opponent doesn't matter, since you still win if you have more health at the end of a round. The game makes no distinction between time-outs and kills; either way counts as a "win" as far as anyone is concerned. You could argue that that's not a "true" win, but at the end of the day, the win-loss counter in Ranked matches doesn't lie .S-Advent wrote:Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).Schooly D wrote:So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!S-Advent wrote:Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.
Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.
Sort of. More specifically, I was saying that if we accept the idea that you have to bring your opponent's health down to 0 to actually beat them, then the best course of action when you're down in health (and would normally play aggressively) is to run away.chunkypuff31 wrote:What Schooly is saying is that actually killing your opponent doesn't matter, since you still win if you have more health at the end of a round. The game makes no distinction between time-outs and kills; either way counts as a "win" as far as anyone is concerned. You could argue that that's not a "true" win, but at the end of the day, the win-loss counter in Ranked matches doesn't lie .S-Advent wrote:Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).Schooly D wrote:So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!S-Advent wrote:Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.
Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.
Now that makes a whole lot of sense. C' mon Ken, please upload some more videos, I'm dying here...Schooly D wrote:Sort of. More specifically, I was saying that if we accept the idea that you have to bring your opponent's health down to 0 to actually beat them, then the best course of action when you're down in health (and would normally play aggressively) is to run away.S-Advent wrote:Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).Schooly D wrote:So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!S-Advent wrote:Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.
Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.
For example, if I'm down 20% to 80%, and it's unlikely that I can overcome the deficit, then my strategy should be to run away. Because if I run away and my opponent can't finish me off, even if the score ends at 80% to 5%, then he didn't actually win.