Virtual-On Forums

I don't know why neoKen but, when I look at your videos they seem so stretched to me. It's like somebody stretched the sides by an inch.

neo helbeast wrote:I don't know why neoKen but, when I look at your videos they seem so stretched to me. It's like somebody stretched the sides by an inch.

480i 4:3 widescreen converted to deinterlaced 16:9 widescreen. Before uploading to youtube, my videos are 512x288 resolution, 60fps.

[place holder]

Glitch where I won a round, despite having less life. Probably online only.

SwordedShepard sent me a replay vs LECTER5656. So far, it is my favorite match. I called it "Heaven Sword". You'll see why

Here are all the 4/29 tournament loser bracket matches:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isJdBOLKoSw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO5eE5dBUjA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTG0qFUBEnY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpI1uekN0wU

I added something special to the videos

S-Advent wrote:Those vids were awesome, and that special something has to do with the music, right?

Yes, the music were from chunkypuf's rip of CyberNet Rhapsody Episode #14 CD.

Bal-bados instant death lasers.

In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...

S-Advent wrote:

neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...

So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!

Zaarock vs PhantomPhotonX. Aggressive play style.

Yes, that was a great match. Zaarock had a good air CC in there, and also the laser at the end was pretty cool!

Yeah, nice games back then. That match was pretty weird but it looks cool as a replay.

Schooly D wrote:

S-Advent wrote:

neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...

So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!

Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).

Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.

neoKEN wrote:Zaarock vs PhantomPhotonX. Aggressive play style.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOBXQLUkaRY

Nice match, thanks for capturing and posting it.

S-Advent wrote:

Schooly D wrote:

S-Advent wrote:

neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...

So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!

Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).

Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.

What Schooly is saying is that actually killing your opponent doesn't matter, since you still win if you have more health at the end of a round. The game makes no distinction between time-outs and kills; either way counts as a "win" as far as anyone is concerned. You could argue that that's not a "true" win, but at the end of the day, the win-loss counter in Ranked matches doesn't lie .

chunkypuff31 wrote:

S-Advent wrote:

Schooly D wrote:

S-Advent wrote:

neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...

So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!

Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).

Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.

What Schooly is saying is that actually killing your opponent doesn't matter, since you still win if you have more health at the end of a round. The game makes no distinction between time-outs and kills; either way counts as a "win" as far as anyone is concerned. You could argue that that's not a "true" win, but at the end of the day, the win-loss counter in Ranked matches doesn't lie .

Sort of. More specifically, I was saying that if we accept the idea that you have to bring your opponent's health down to 0 to actually beat them, then the best course of action when you're down in health (and would normally play aggressively) is to run away.

For example, if I'm down 20% to 80%, and it's unlikely that I can overcome the deficit, then my strategy should be to run away. Because if I run away and my opponent can't finish me off, even if the score ends at 80% to 5%, then he didn't actually win.

Schooly D wrote:

S-Advent wrote:

Schooly D wrote:

S-Advent wrote:

neoKEN wrote:In the name of science, Schooly test to see if using ONLY RW is enough to win with temjin.

Hmmm... It does work, but to actually beat your opponent, you got to kill 'em, although...

So what you're saying is, if I'm down in health, I should run away? Because if I can just survive the round, my opponent won't actually beat me? This changes everything!

Eh..? What I'm saying is use the same strategy with a different one and take down your opponent before time runs out (Plus, I'm not sure that I should take your post seriously or not due to its sarcasm).

Also, that was a nice match between Zaarock and PhantomPhotonX, kinda reminds me of DBZ back in the day.

Sort of. More specifically, I was saying that if we accept the idea that you have to bring your opponent's health down to 0 to actually beat them, then the best course of action when you're down in health (and would normally play aggressively) is to run away.

For example, if I'm down 20% to 80%, and it's unlikely that I can overcome the deficit, then my strategy should be to run away. Because if I run away and my opponent can't finish me off, even if the score ends at 80% to 5%, then he didn't actually win.

Now that makes a whole lot of sense. C' mon Ken, please upload some more videos, I'm dying here...