DNA vs RNA Idea

[Solar*Sonic]

I was thinking, inclusion to the Team and USINT tournaments, that there could be the DNA vs RNA Tournaments.
Maybe not so much a tournament per say, but more like an online ongoing war a few times a month. Instead of choosing a team or group every challenge, When 1 is apart of either the RNA or DNA side, they are permanently Apart of that side unless they request to change over and the request is approved by an RNA or DNA leader. For example lets say Anikingvoot is a DNA leader and i SolarSonic am a DNA agent/member and message Anikingvoot ,via xbox or forums, to leave DNA and I would still be apart of DNA until He reads the message and replys back telling me that he read it. Then he would contact the rest of DNA or make a public announcement the SolarSonic left DNA. Not that the leader would have to make the decision if the member can leave or not, its a just a way of letting the whole group know the member is leaving so that there is no confusion as to who is on what side during matches.
On another note, I havent figured out how to determine who is a leader or if there should be other levels of athority/rankings through out the two sides.
the overall concept of this is to have a couple if not a few challenges a month. In a match the RNA members MUST request the DNA member to fight, that way the color scheme is in line with reality.
I plan on coming up with more idea for this too. Ill be sure to post those ideas on this topic when they come about.
If any of you have thought to contribute, please do and tell me what you think of this type of challenge?

[Solar*Sonic]

I have thought of a way to determine who would be leaders. Vote between members on these forums. Make a topic to vote 2 leaders for DNA and 2 for RNA. There can be more leaders later, those can be chosen by the established leaders. Then there should be a middle rank for experienced members and a newb rank for new members.
As for deciding who is on what side. Just post what side you prefer. If you are indifferent, then you will be put on whatever side that make an even amount of people for both sides.
Im thinking that it should be the leaders responsibility to see how many players there is on each side for 1 session. Then choose which of their members should fight first second and so on. There should be a designated Observer who keeps track of who wins and which ever side has most wins is the winner unless there is a draw. In that case, all the Leaders will fight each other until 1 side gets more wins and that side is the winner and most dominate side until the next session. As for all the other details about failed connections and set match rules. All rules should be the same as the USINT tournaments.
Im thinking about having the first session next sunday Nov 8.
Does anyone have any opinions on any of this? I need some feed back.

[MentholMoose]

It sounds interesting, but maybe the teams should be randomized to avoid stacking. Would the "wars" be scheduled for a set time?

[Solar*Sonic]

It sounds interesting, but maybe the teams should be randomized to avoid stacking. Would the "wars" be scheduled for a set time?

Yes. Probably evening in EST time zones. I agree the teams should be randomized. How would we go about doing that thought? Drawing names?

[Alaric14]

Sounds fun; we could get some weekly/monthly scoreboards up on the forums detailing battles which took place. My only problem is with the EST time frame. Any chance of others being organised around international players?

[Solar*Sonic]

yes actually i just thought that there can be two sessions. One for US and one for international and if someone from the us wanted to stay and also be apart of the international, or vise versa, that would be fine.
I just got another idea. That the rankings from the USINT Tounnaments can be incorporated into this to determine who is a leader, member, or new.
Scoreboards are a great idea. They could also show which side is winning.